Updated 11-03-2010

Did you get the Establishment’s memo?

„Earth Changes and the Pole Shift” and ZetaTalk® have been striving to inform you about the upcoming cataclysms, with the truth. The Establishment, people in positions of power and intimately responsible for the current status quo, do not want it to be that way. They are busy trotting along their lies through their minions around the internet, including this Ning and other means of mass communication, by using agents of disinformation.

If you have just arrived to the Earth Changes and the Pole Shift, we intend to help you sort out the wheat from the chaff when it comes to the reality of Planet X, what it’s doing to our planet Earth, and discard what you will soon find out are lies you were told.

profiles/blogs/main-establishment-lies

But. . . does NASA lie? You might ask . . .

But some people still doubt:

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for October 30, 2010

Q: „NASA has acknowledged that Solar Cycle 24 can result in large solar storms that could be catastrophic for humanity. The Zetas have said that NASA blamed the sun and will not admit that the magnetic disturbances are generated by the planet X. If NASA knows something and has hinted that information, we may deduce that they have calculated the passage of Planet X in those years. ( science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/10mar_sto… ) I wonder: Absolutely all the information supplied by NASA’s solar flares in 2012-2013 and the consequences on earth are lies to hide the real causes?”

A: „There are many ways to lie, and NASA uses all these means. One lies by boldface statements that are lies, and NASA does this by openly stating that Planet X is a rumor and not a reality. So given that, why would you even be asking if what they say about the Sun is truth? Because they mix truth with fiction, which is yet another way to lie. Of course there are solar cyclesevery 10.7 years or so, the last solar maximum occurring in March, 2000. Do the math! At present you should be into the next solar maximum. It should be now. But are you having massive CME’s as occurred in the year 2000? No! This photo is of a year 2000 CME, X class. In order to hype the 2012 lie, that nothing will happen until December 21, 2012, NASA moved the date of the solar maximum to 2012, yet another lie. At present, because amateurs have scopes and can view the face of the Sun, NASA cannot simply invent a large CME, but this does not keep them from getting in to the news, prognosticating that the Sun is about to explode into activity, because they are frantic to blame the Sun for the Earth changes. This, despite the fact that this solar cycle is so sleeply, with such a lack of sunspots, that it is almost breaking all records.”
„When their own images and archives show the presence of Planet X they allowed their archives to be doctored to appear that these anomalies on the SOHO images have been present all along. Inserting erroneous data is a lie too, but they have not stopped at the SOHO doctoring, as doctoring the SOHO backgroundof stars and planets has been a practice since 2003 when the Earth stopped in her orbit. Edit lines, evidence of cutting and pasting, have been present since 2003 also.
Silly explanations for evidence of Planet X in the solar system is also not beyond NASA, who will say anything but the truth on this matter. When the Moons of Planet X appeared on solar images, and the issue went viral on the Internet, NASA declared them a „compression artifact”. The irrepressible Moon Swirls of Planet X showing up on the SOHO images were claimed asasteroid collisions only recently caught on film by NASA, or so they said. So you are asking if you should discount everythingNASA says about the Sun or pending solar storms? With a track record like this, the question should be why any intelligent person believes anything they say! Do you not have a brain? Are you endlessly gullible? Do you lack evidence of their lies? And given that the larger the lie, the more reluctant the liar is to admit their guilt, do you expect NASA to
change? We presume the answer is so obvious.”

_______________________________________________________________________________________

When Lies Fail

It’s the Sun dummy!

It’s Global Warming

One of those preferred lies, and one that had been long in the planning, is the Solar Flare/Super Electromagnetic storm theory:

NASA’s Cover

newsletr/issue197.htm
Frantic to maintain their cover story, that the Earth changes are caused by the Sun and not a mythical Planet X – NASA immediately grabbed media attention with predictions for what they called a „solar tsunami”. At this point in the solar cycle, the Sun is approaching the solar maximum, and should be having sunspots and CMEs, and a C3 class flare is a minor affair. Yet in using a word like „tsunami” in the media, NASA’s predictions implied something dire.

Aurora Borealis Activity likely August 3/4, 2010 from Solar Coronal Mass Ejection
August 2, 2010
united-states/aurora-borealis
NASA announced the discovery of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) on August 1, 2010. The CME resulted from a class C3 solar flare and was aimed towards Earth. The coronal mass ejection should reach Earth on the night of August 3/4, 2010. The CME will cause a higher than normal possibility of aurora, also called northern lights, activity on the evening of August 3 and the morning of August 4.

Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity
August 1, 2010
news/viewsr.html?pid=34624
Geomagnetic field activity is expected to be at quiet levels during most of day 1 (02 August). An increase to unsettled to active levels is expected late on day 1 due to the arrival of the full-halo CME observed on 01 August. Activity is expected to increase to unsettled to active levels with a chance for minor storm levels on day 2 (03 August) as CME effects persist. Activity is expected to decrease to quiet to unsettled levels with a chance for active levels on day 3 (04 August) as CME effects subside.

Per the Zetas, NASA was risking a flop by this media barrage, but unless the public would associate any electromagnetic disturbance with the Sun, their cover story risked being debunked. Since a C3 event is tiny, as solar flares go, they immediately took their SOHO satellites offline for „bakeout” maintenance so the non-event could not be viewed. Compare the August 1, 2010 C3 with an X class flare that occurred during the last solar maximum in 2000. See the difference?

ZetaTalk Prediction 3/6/2010: The excuses they planned to use were to blame the Sun for any
electromagnetic problems, and they still plan to do so even though the severe interference with
the Earth’s magnetosphere started while the Sun was virtually asleep. They will grasp at every
minor CME as proof of this theory. They had planned to blame rogue asteroids or asteroid
swarms for the moons and debris in the tail of Planet X, and have already mustered this excuse
forth, claiming that asteroids crash into each other producing dust clouds. Thus, the many moons
seen on SOHO and the Stereo images, with a drifting tail of dust, were to be explained away. By
inferring that the Chile quake altered the rotation time span of the Earth, they are trying to put
into the public’s mind the idea that quakes can affect rotation. Global Warming of course was to
be the excuse for rising seas caused by heat rising from the core of the Earth, though this has
now been taken from them. Any additional excuses they muster forth will not be believed, as
what is about to unfold will take them by surprise!

But this has not stopped NASA from continuing their campaign. Trust us, they say, the Sun is going to
do horrible things! They are still warning of a worst ever solar maximum, despite the fact that that Sun is
simply not cooperating.

ZetaTalk: Written on July 15 1996
[excerpt]
The effect [of Solar Flares] on Earth is in the realm of energy disruption, a surge of the various energy arenas that humans are aware of and others they are unaware of. Solar flares affect the activity of fish and kelp in the sea, in that water bends and deflects some energy rays and thus concentrates them. Just as humans find themselves more restless during a full moon, life in the sea is a bit more restless during solar flares – energized. Solar flares do not affect the core of the Earth, nor are they causing increased earthquake activity. This explanation by the establishment for increased activity in the Earth’s core is to avoid mentioning the approach of the 12th Planet, and is easily rebutted. Have sunspots resulted in earthquakes in the past?
________________________________________________________________________________________

G1.9 Cover

Spanish astronomers have supposedly located a brown dwarf near our solar system, on a loop bringing this brown dwarf fairly close to the Sun!

G1.9 Confirmed Binary Dwarf Star Very Near Sun
June 15, 2010
story/79/402/G1.9_Confirmed_Binary_Dwarf_Star

Scientists at places like NASA and famous observatories have deflected inquiries about the discovery for a few years now, mainly because they feared being associated with these „fringe” theories. But like it or not — it has happened. According to a team of Spanish artronomers who
call themselves the StarViewer Team. The group made the rounds of all the news web sites in the
past two weeks, claiming they discovered something very significant. It’s almost twice the size of
Jupiter and just beyond our furthest planetoid, Pluto. Although it’s not a planet, it appears to
have planets or large satellites encircling it. It’s what astronomers call a „brown dwarf star”
and its official name is „G1.9″. The newly discovered brown dwarf is reported to be located just
about 60 to 66 AU (1 AU=the distance from the Sun to Earth) from us (its parigee), currently in
the direction of the constellation Sagittarius.

Ah, the perfect excuse! Now when the magnetic field is blasted, and there is no activity on the Sun to cover, NASA can claim that G1.9 caused this! The photo even looks a bit like the inbound Planet X did in 2003! Per the Zetas, this is all part of the plan, as this is a hoax attempting to duplicate the approach of Planet X in
2003.

ZetaTalk Comment 8/7/2010: NASA is frantic to take the lead, having stonewalled the subject up until
now. When Planet X was inbound from 1997 to 2003, we, the Zetas provided coordinates by which a
dim star with bright fuzz around it could be seen tracking to our coordinates. Then in early 2003 when
it passed from the night sky to be lost in the glare of the Sun, there were dramatic photos showing an
approaching planet surrounded by a swirling double helix dust cloud on either side. After that, we
entered the era of the Second Sun, when Planet X was close to the Sun in the line of view, but showing
up on SOHO and certainly making an impact on the Earth’s magnetosphere. Now that their desperate
attempts to blame the Sun or Global Warming for the Earth changes and Earth wobble, they are
hoping to grasp the reins of leadership and announce they have found the source of all these
perturbations! Yes, it is G1.9, which astronomers have suddenly located! Is this the Sun’s binary? No,
the Sun’s binary is 18.74 Sun-Pluto distances away in the direction of the constellation Orion, and is
static, not moving. Is this even a brown dwarf? To fit in mankind’s description, a brown dwarf must be
gaseous and huge, so that it could be, theoretically, an unlit star. Certainly the photos they are
providing do not fit this description, as there is a light source from somewhere illuminating the red
wings on either side, and if from this so-called brown dwarf, why is the dwarf itself unlit? Is this,
perhaps, a complete fraud, as amateur cannot find this body. Astronomers tasked with inventing
something to compete with our early photos of Planet X have indeed invented a complete fraud. NASA
is pretending to argue and ignore these astronomers, to give the illusion that they are not working
together. Liars, all of them.

____________________________________________________________________________

Also learn about:

Magnetic Versus Geographic Poles

And whether poles reverse in polarity:

ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals
Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

---

Do the Earth’s poles ever suffer a reversal during a pole shift? No. Although Yahoo! would like to have us believe otherwise:

bSuper Learn Math Easy Superlearnmath Super Learn Math Easy Super Learn Math Kłamstwa elit światowych,i agenci wpływu w mediach i internecie,a sprawa Nibiru. « Zenobiusz's Blogw Super Learn Math Super Learn Math Super Learn Math pSuper Learn Math Easy Superlearnmath Super Learn Math Easy Super Learn Math Kłamstwa elit światowych,i agenci wpływu w mediach i internecie,a sprawa Nibiru. « Zenobiusz's Blogt f Gradient m m Learn m Trigonometry Super Learn Math